Listen Up TV Viewers, Welcome
Discussion, Media March 22nd, 2009To all of you that learned of our campaign through Listen Up TV and decided to check out our website, welcome to the Canadian Atheist Bus Campaign! To everyone else that hasn’t a clue what I’m talking about, Listen Up TV is a television program exploring news and current affairs from a Christian worldview. Today they aired a show about us on Global TV that can also be viewed on their website.
There are a few things I wanted to address that Lorna Dueck (Listen Up TV Host) mentioned during the show but first please take note that their broadcast is fairly slanted towards a Christian perspective and doesn’t really give a fair and equal opportunity for both Atheist and Christian viewpoints. Justin and myself spent 15-20 minutes each in-front of a camera with ListenUp but unfortunately our parts were edited and cut to a small 2-3 minutes. The show in total lasted 23 minutes 25 seconds. Despite our parts being cut short, I am grateful that they gave us an opportunity to speak with them.
During Answering Atheism Lorna spoke with David Harrison and later Dave Schmelzer, both about their religious experiences and how they went from Atheist to Christian. The two discussions revolved around experience and reason. Experience is referenced as their encounter with prayer and crying out to or asking a supposed god for help and guidance. According to them, ‘god’ responded. A website called god Is Imaginary lists 50 proofs that god is not real and the first proof is simply asking people to try praying, I encourage you to read through it for yourself and possibly test out the first proof. Try asking God why he never heals amputees and then take a look at whywontgodhealamputees.com. Dave S. and David H. both prayed and coincidentally had some sort of result that could be explained away without a divinity.
Response to LUT’s The Wrap which discusses ’3 Reasons/Tests to Believe in God’
First Test according to Lorna: “the test of reason – everything has to have a starting point, it’s the law of thermodynamics. All matter has a beginning, and if it began, it has to have a cause. Science and theology relate to that. The test of reason for belief in God is not afraid to explain origin, irreducible complexity, and cause”
There are three laws of thermodynamics. The first law of thermodynamics is that energy is never created or destroyed, it only changes form. For example: the energy used during the combustion phase of a four-stroke engine is not lost, it simply is changes form. A large portion of that energy is turned into heat, kinetic energy, and some turned into sound, but none of that energy is ever lost- it simply changes form. The second law simplified states: “It is impossible for a process to have as its sole result the transfer of heat from a cooler body to a hotter one”(About.com). The third law implies that it is impossible to cool down a system all the way to exactly absolute zero.
Apparently this is the test of reason to find God. It somehow implies a beginning and an end, doesn’t sound like it to me though.
But lets give Lorna a break, let’s suppose that everything has a beginning and an end, after all she is taking Thomas Aquinas (1225-1274) five argument for the existence of God and compressing it into a dozen words. Aquinas basically argued that everything is the result of a cause before it, for example a billiard ball is moved by a cue, you move the cue, and there is a chain of movements before that leads up to that movement, or, every action is a reaction from an action before it. Aquinas believed that there was a first mover, something that originally set motion to the chain of events in our universe. He calls this first mover God. Unfortunately for Aquinas and other Christians that follow this school of thought, no one could ever prove how the first mover related to Christian theology or any theology. In other words, ‘so what’ if there was a first mover because there is nothing to imply that the first mover was the Christian god or a god of any other religion. For all we know the first mover could have been a bunch of fairies moving things, or the first mover could have moved the universe and then dropped dead. There is no evidence at all to support a first mover as the Christian god, and if there was a first movement, there’s no evidence to support it was any god of any type.
As for irreducible complexity.. that argument was debunked and disproved years ago. Michael J. Behe couldn’t ever get the scientific community to support his argument about the eye, flagellum, and mousetrap all being a complex system that would fail if one part was removed. In sum, Behe said that these complex systems would fail if a single part was removed, the removed part would render the systems useless and unable to have evolved from earlier simpler systems. His theory was largely debunked during the Kitzmiller v. Dover case when Intelligent Design was ruled out of Dover county school system. Watch Dr. Kenneth Miller debunk irreducible complexity on YouTube here.
Second Test according to Lorna: “Test of experience, we know we experience an innate sense of right and wrong, a sense of universal moral law. Why is love the highest law of this moral code? Where does that experience originate from?”
The answer is in the words evolution and empathy and I highly recommend you read this four page PDF on “The Evolution of Empathy” from Berkley University. In this document Frans B. M. de Waal shows us how our evolutionary history suggests a deep-rooted propensity for feelings of emotions of others.
Third Test according to Lorna: “Take the test of practice. Is belief in God and what that requires, something a person can actually consistently live with? People do practice christian doctrines in error, that explains past religious wars [...] but when Christian truth is applied correctly, does it past the test of practice. Can you live with it, day in and day out. In a way that brings you joy, peace, and improves who you are?”
Is practice of Christianity really what we want? Godisimaginary.com has created a great YouTube video titled “The Bible Is Repulsive“, it explains how according to the Bible we should be stoned and put to death if we work on the Sabbath day, that non-believing towns and inhabitants should be destroyed, and a few other shocking details about the bible that most Christians don’t know about simply because they haven’t read the bible all the way through. EvilBible.com is also a great resource to show all the horrible parts in the bible that are often overlooked. Belief in God is something we can consistently live without and there’s a popular saying that that “[...]good people will do good things, and bad people will do bad things. But for good people to do bad things — that takes religion.” — Steven Weinberg Nobel Prize in Physics (thanks to Galen for the comment giving me the correct quote).






March 22nd, 2009 at 7:42 am
“Good people will do good things, and bad people will
do bad things. But for good people to do bad things — that takes religion.” — Steven Weinberg Nobel Prize in Physics
March 22nd, 2009 at 9:34 am
Great post
March 22nd, 2009 at 11:15 am
I second that – great post. It baffles me why people still have the need to believe in god. It is not necessary any longer. Superstitions die hard.
March 22nd, 2009 at 9:57 pm
the first mover could have moved the universe and then dropped dead.
LOL!
Good post!
Thanks for the link to Evolution of Empathy. I’ve read some of Frans DeWaal’s other work so look forward to checking out the document.
March 23rd, 2009 at 10:52 am
Well I already established that you guys don’t know that your brand of “atheism” includes ignosticism, which is already a definition problem. That you don’t know what a honeypot is, and now you’re trying to tackle the “prime mover” argument?
Did you read my references to Dawkin’s Ultimate 747 Gambit and the “crane for physics” (not a skyhook issue, that there is a process yet to be discovered which explains the existence of physics)? Use wikipedia, its good, you might learn something, especially about “honeypots”.
Hey, I’ll take a leap, maybe even CSIS honeypots. You guys hooked up in something here? Bah, probably not, you won’t even check the definitions… You’ve heard of CSIS, right, legally prevented from ending projects even if laws are being broken? Check out their site, apply for a job, you’re well qualified… using me and my family as honeypots, I mean.
March 23rd, 2009 at 10:54 am
I saw it on their website and had a good laugh. My favourite part was where the host asks Justin how his beliefs can give him hope, and his response is that he preferred to seek after truth than want hope. My question is ‘hope for what?’ – that everything goes your way? I also enjoyed the bit at the beginning where she says that deciding whether or not to believe in god is the most important question of your life. Says who? It’s definitely not mine. I don’t walk around obsessed with whether or not Krishna exists. Bah. As a recovering evangelical christian, I think I can say that I’m so over christianity.
My main charge against them? That they are boring and completely lacking in imagination. Get with the times people – you cling to bronze age beliefs in a digital world….
March 23rd, 2009 at 12:23 pm
“Bronze Age Beliefs”, what that CSIS knows how to track IP traffic? And that the GTA is the source of 150 high risk ITF take-downs every year?
Source: Inside Canadian Intelligence, “Exposing the New Realities of Espionage and Interational Terrorsism”, Dwight Hamilton, Page 96, published 2006.
What part of the Bronze age was 2006, anyway?
March 23rd, 2009 at 12:40 pm
I like that “bronze age beliefs in a digital world” line. I was listening to Eddie Current (physics joke I guess) anti-Christian drivel on youtube the other day, and this digital age stuff could be allegorically related to “the soul” of ancient times. Anyway, I prefer the computer angle, so this prime mover thing and appeals to the proof of anything (I guess it was gods we were talking about) are appeals to physical law which you guys seem to worship. Alas, it is the simulation of reality in your brains which *saves* you from worship or exposure to physical law, and you can thank the military, the police and the *laws* for that, not the laws of physics.
This is the allegory of the ancient texts. The freaking law, people.
March 23rd, 2009 at 1:13 pm
Anna,
I don’t belive for one second that you were ever a “christian” in the sense that you understood and followed the teachings of the “fictional” Jesus.
I don’t believe for one second that most so-called christians follow the teachings of the “fictional” Jesus.
If they did they would be spending their lives working to end all war, asking their governments to disband their armies, selling all their belongings, feeding the poor, healing the sick.
How many “christians” do you know live like this ?
Almost none. Maybe some humanists.
March 23rd, 2009 at 9:05 pm
Gabriel wrote:
I don’t believe for one second that most so-called christians follow the teachings of the “fictional” Jesus.
If they did they would be spending their lives working to end all war, asking their governments to disband their armies,
Maybe they believe the message of Jesus was more like this passage from Matthew?
Do not think that I came to bring peace on the earth; I did not come to bring peace, but a sword. Matt 10:34
March 25th, 2009 at 10:37 am
Gabriel writes:
Anna,
I don’t belive for one second that you were ever a “christian” in the sense that you understood and followed the teachings of the “fictional” Jesus.
I don’t believe for one second that most so-called christians follow the teachings of the “fictional” Jesus.
If they did they would be spending their lives working to end all war, asking their governments to disband their armies, ….
It’s interesting that Gabriel seems to think he understands the teachings of Jesus better than most others. Why is this? More connected than the rest of us to the “One”?
And Matthew 11:34 wasn’t really spoken by Jesus either, I suppose: “Do not think that I came to bring peace on earth. I did not come to bring peace but a sword!” (International Standard Version)
This is what’s so wonderful about religion. Their sacred texts and great leaders can be interpreted in a zillion ways to teach just about anything one wants to believe. How is this better than philosophy? Or science?
IMO, it’s not the least bit better.
What’s that about “selling all their belongings”? And with the revenue generated they will do what? Then they will live off the state or the church or their followers or whomever will take pity on them? That teaching seems a little “pot o’ gold at the end of the rainbow”. Not too practical. Wasteful, too, if you can’t get what you paid for them in the first place.
I’m against war most of the time. It makes sense to use resources to help people enjoy the planet while it exists. Feeding the hungry and helping the sick seems like a good idea if you want to have others take pity on you some time in the future. Reciprocity is a good reason for doing a lot of things. Social networking is valuable and animal studies like those done by Frans de Waal seem to suggest that these “instincts” toward empathy have some evolutionary basis.
(It’s raining outside so I can’t be reading outside on the deck, just in case anyone was wondering why I’m back.)
March 25th, 2009 at 10:58 am
” EvilBible.com is also a great resource to show all the horrible parts in the bible that are often overlooked”
This makes me wonder if adoption of atheism so clouds ones thinking that you do not notice “often overlooked” in your own sentence. Let me translate: “often overlooked” means, drum roll please, they’re freaking “overloooked”.
Like take John 1:1. A nice little piece of philosophy followed by a magic show. I suggest stopping just on the one word in ancient greek “logos” and then going to a more modern philosophical work for some “less evil” philosophical interpretation of it.
Sheesh.
March 25th, 2009 at 2:37 pm
Skeptical Lynda,
I have converted to your way of thinking.
March 25th, 2009 at 3:03 pm
Jeffk – the idea of God/nature can be read in Spinoza’s Ethics.
The atheists will “probably” never ever find God because he/she/it exists in every single particle and they continue to look for “Him” in the heavens.
There is nothing but “God”.
Yes even Justin and Chris are completely made of “God” but cannot find him/she/it.
So their banner is perfectly reasonable.
The atheist will “probably” never ever “know” God.
So as Jesus says in Matt 6:34 “stop worrying” and enjoy your life.
March 25th, 2009 at 9:04 pm
The atheists will “probably” never ever find God because he/she/it exists in every single particle and they continue to look for “Him” in the heavens.
Gabriel,
Which atheists are looking for god in the heavens? It might be a good idea not to lump all atheists together into one bunch with a common desire to “find God”. I’ve met some who are quite satisfied to live life without a god and spend their time enjoying this life with no interest in searching for anything that might be considered “god”.
Jeff K,
I think the specific word that offers better meaning to the sentence you quoted is “often”, not “overlooked”.
March 25th, 2009 at 9:07 pm
Looks like this box doesn’t offer much for highlighting quotes. I was quoting Gabriel with that first statement in #14.
March 26th, 2009 at 10:36 am
Skeptikal Lynda.
It looks like you have converted to my way of thinking. I also agree that “God” (whatever “that” is) exists as you say in every suingle particle. I am “that” I am.
God is in “All” and all is in “God” (whatever “that” is)
As you say – “some” have stopped looking. But that really doesn’t matter. As you say, Whether you look or don’t look….”God” is all “that” is.
March 28th, 2009 at 9:18 am
Gabriel wrote: It looks like you have converted to my way of thinking.
Gabriel,
LOL! I couldn’t possibly convert to your way of thinking because I don’t understand it.
But as you say, it doesn’t matter anyway.
March 30th, 2009 at 2:54 pm
SL,
If you do not understand “it”. You understand “it”
The one and many consciousness is beyond expression, beyond language, beyond knowing. If it is everywhere yet not known, this is truly a great mystery. Not yet understood.
March 30th, 2009 at 3:25 pm
You should also look up the Skeptics annotated bible for a response to test 3…great stuff.
http://skepticsannotatedbible.com/
April 2nd, 2009 at 4:07 pm
Notice how they reference “Expelled: The Movie” as a *helpful link* in their Resources section at the end of the article?
Yeah, that’s a helpful link all right.
/sarcasm